click images to see enlargement
 Face It, Baby #2
 Face It, Baby #2
      1992, acrylic on canvas, 50" x 42"
      
    
    
 Between (My
      Ferragamo scarf)
 Between (My
      Ferragamo scarf)
      1994, oil on canvas, 18" x 20"
      
    
  On a Somewhat Less Altruistic Note...
 On a Somewhat Less Altruistic Note...
      1994-98, mixed media, 5" x 7" each; 13" x 11" each, with frame
      (triptych, custom framed)
      sold 
    
    
 Half Dozen
 Half Dozen
      1997, oil on canvas, 3" x 4"
      sold
    
    
 Egg Study #5
 Egg Study #5
      1998, oil on canvas, 4" x 6" oval
      sold
    
 Orchid,
      fading #2 (before revision)
Orchid,
      fading #2 (before revision)
      2003-07, colored pencil, encaustic on birch panel, 12" x 12" 
       study, nfs
    
    
 Untitled
      (leaf)
Untitled
      (leaf) 
      2003, colored pencil on ash panel, (4.75 in. x 7 in.)
      sold 
    
While still a painting major at the San Francisco Art Institute, I made several surreal, symbolic, surrealistic paintings of human infants and/or skeletons under water. These were not meant to be morbid, nor did I intend them to be disturbing (Face It, Baby).
This archetypal
            imagery came to me in the early 1990's, during meditation encounters
            with the subconscious, while I was enrolled in a course called "Art,
            Spirit, Psyche," with the San Francisco Art Institute. It was very
            much like watching an old, monochromatic, World War II newsreel:
            while still awake, but with my eyes closed, I clearly saw a living
            infant (no, not a fetus), floating quite calmly in some sort of
            liquid; the child moved its limbs quite freely, so it was not
            amniotic fluid but some large body of water. The baby was clearly
            not drowned. It was alive and comfortable in this element.
          
When I was painting my first impression from this vision, a stranger came up to watch me, as I worked in one of the S.F.A.I. studios. He stood there for some time.
"You obviously don't have kids,
            do you?" he finally asked me. "No, I don't," I replied, turning to him with a
            smile. His jaw clenched. "I didn't THINK so!" he huffed, storming
            out of the studio. I can only imagine that the poor fellow must have
            thought I was callously painting a drowning or drowned baby. (And,
            to be fair, there was quite a lot of morbid student artwork
            on display then; dismembered figures were particularly popular at
            the time.)
          
Years later, while researching Celtic stories for my
        current work, I found a reference to Taliesin as a "child emerging from
        the sea." Later, I read of other cultures which also feature a water
        baby or hero. Perhaps my subconscious had tapped into that. I have been present at a few births, as well as deaths, so I
        do know firsthand that these significant moments of entry and exit to
        and from this world are often deeply profound, or even sacred. 
        
The Latin American cultures in San Francisco's Mission
        district, where I lived, were also an influence on my imagery. Mexico's Dios de Los Muertos, or Day of
        the Dead, celebrated annually on November 2, follows on the heels of All
        Saint's Day and All Hallow's Eve (what we now call Hallowe'en). While
        painting my early works, the immortal triad of human existence (Time,
        Love, and Death) would frequently surface, often reflecting traditional
        Mexican Vanitas (Between (My
            Feragamo scarf ) and Cupid,
          Being Stupid). Whether
        we are viewing a portrait, a still life, a landscape, or an abstract
        image, it may be permeated with potential and/or loss, as the painter,
        Mark Rothko, conveyed through his
          abstract works.
      
A tiny mixed-media triptych, using photographs I took of
        Fred, my plastic skeleton model, lying in the snow near Lake Tahoe (On A Somewhat Less Altruistic Note...)
        and the Cupid paintings, were originally inspired by a sequence of
        events I'd experienced on Dios de Los Muertos.
        But the child of Venus and Mars is NOT a cherub, and
        is definitely not any sort of of angel. I suspect Christianity, and the
        commercialization of St. Valentine's Day, both did Cupid a kind of
        disservice, if not entirely undeserved (see Cupids).
        Many classical paintings feature cute little Putti, which are
        depicted as, chubby,
        lily-white toddlers; they're sometimes confusingly mis-labelled as
        cupids (more about all this by Jonathan Kurtzman and Doug Newsom in Quora). 
      
I feel that the tale of Cupid and Psyche was made most personal and clear in the timeless work, Till We Have Faces, by C.S. Lewis.